“The judge identified nine aspects of An Inconvenient Truth, nine core errors, where Al Gore either misstated the IPCC or prejudicially exaggerated what they found.” John Day is the lawyer for a British parent who sued the British Department
of Education when they tried to distribute An Inconvenient Truth to schools.
The review that looked the other way
Written by Kristin McMurray   
Wednesday, 10 March 2010 18:30
Multithumb found errors on this page:

There was a problem loading image http://staff.science.uva.nl/~rhd/NWO_prof.dr.RobbertDijkgraaf.jpg
DijksgraafThe Global Warming community has faced at least 19 scandals in the past few months, which is why the IPCC is now facing an "independent" review by the InterAcademy Council (IAC).  What is shocking is that the review will not challenge man-made Global Warming and will not look at the scientific data.

"It will definitely not go over vast amounts of data," Robert Dijksgraaf, the head of the InterAcademy Council told reporters. "Our goal will be to assure nations around the world that they will receive sound scientific advice on climate science."

Dijksgraaf said the review is going to be looking at the peer-review process, steps to becoming a more transparent organization, and what qualifies as a source for the 2014 report.

The IAC is a partner of the UNEP and World Bank, both which have close ties to IPCC's chairman Dr. Rajendra Pachauri and the IPCC.  This may be why the review is so forward focused, refusing to see the flaws that scar the IPCC's reputation.

One must question if the IAC will be able to be objective when the review's conclusion may threaten the organization's own reports supporting Global Warming.

Share this page on your favorite Social Websites...

Comments (0)add comment

Write comment