“The judge identified nine aspects of An Inconvenient Truth, nine core errors, where Al Gore either misstated the IPCC or prejudicially exaggerated what they found.” John Day is the lawyer for a British parent who sued the British Department
of Education when they tried to distribute An Inconvenient Truth to schools.
Global Warmers only believe in censoring those who disagree with them
Written by Phelim McAleer   
Friday, 01 October 2010 16:51
Multithumb found errors on this page:

There was a problem loading image http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcfour/documentaries/storyville/images/franny_armstrong_body.jpg
ArmstrongFanny Armstrong is one seriously hypocritical Global Warmer.

Ms. Armstrong the Director of The Age Of Stupid, a "documentary" that is mostly set in the future and features an actor reading a script, is continuing on her path of being oblivious to the truly hypocritical and deceiving life she leads.

She now runs 10:10 a campaign to persuade people and organizations to reduce their carbon footprint. Along with the writer Richard Curtis [Blackadder, Four Weddings, Notting Hill, and many more], she produced a short film that shows children who don't want to take part in the campaign being blown up and their schoolmates being splattered with guts, blood, and gore (with a small g).

It leaves nothing to the imagination and has created a huge amount of revulsion—which is probably what the rich kid media hound wanted. Now Ms. Armstrong says she didn't realize that blowing children up who disagree with your opinion would offend people, so 10:10 has now removed it from their website.

However Ms. Armstrong adds: "We won't be making any attempt to censor or remove other versions currently in circulation on the internet." (her emphasis)

Yeah, nice one. Pretend to be surprised about the response, watch the controversy create a huge interest—then pretend to do the right thing but ensure you get the widest possible audience by not taking your video down from other Youtube channels.

Oh, and as a nice side bonus among your emotionless, elitist friends you retain the coolness of "being against censorship."

Well, Ms. Armstrong you are a hypocrite.

You flew around the world making and promoting the Age of Stupid even though your documentary pointed out that flying was the biggest cause of global warming.

When I tried to ask you questions about this hypocrisy at the New York premier of the Age Of Stupid—you had your goons throw me out, just for asking a question. Of course, you don't agree with censorship.

Then, when I posted a short video exposing your hypocrisy on Youtube you had your lawyers get it taken down because of a bogus claim that we were abusing your copyright. We had to hire lawyers to get our video back up.

So, Ms Armstrong you had no hesitation using lawyers to try and have our videos removed from Youtube—if you really are sorry for producing the video and agree it was a mistake—get those lawyers into action again and get them to have all copies removed.

Or do you only favor censorship against people you disagree with?

Share this page on your favorite Social Websites...

Comments (3)add comment

Henry Galt said:

Abuse of power.

She can afford to be utterly, repeatedly and purposefully wrong.

We cannot even afford to protest effectively at a 10% scale.

October 01, 2010
Votes: +0

Pete Ridley said:

"Put Pressure" on Franny
Phelim, I am in the process of preparing another part to my article "DEATH BY DROWNING - THE NEXT PHASE OF INDOCTRINATION? " on my blog Global Political Shenaniganse (http://globalpoliticalshenanigans.blogspot.com/) and came across your excellent article. This is very much along the lines of what I am putting together, although I propose to look very closely into Franny's motives. Any assistance that you can give would be appreciated. Do you have an E-mail address for Franny because it is only fair to let her know what I propose and let her see the draft before publication.

You may be intersted in this comment of mine about "No Pressure".


I see that the Guardian has stopped further comments being posted on its thread. Must have realised the damage that the article had done to its already dwindling credibility.

The Science and Public Policy Institute has a good article on this (Note 1) which also gives some background into eco-nutter Frannie Armstrong which suggests to me that perhaps she can be excused just a little. Her gullibility may be due to an unfortunate combination of genes that brought her into this world. On the other hand she may, like AL Gore and his buddies, be simply motivated by money. I suspect that she thought that the UN’s COP15 fiasco in Copenhagen an opportunity to turn her second-rate film-making career around. With all of the political hype that preceded COP15, any gullible person would think it opportune to jump on the bandwagon. Frannie certainly jumped, founding 10:10 after chatting with another staunch supporter of The (significant human-made global climate change) Hypothesis, Ed Miliband.

Miliband is a career politician, not a scientist, and had his own reasons for pushing out his version of the propaganda (Note 2) ahead of COP15. He gave his full support to Gordon Brown’s nonsense that "This is perhaps the greatest challenge that we face as a world” (Note 3). This is evidenced by his comment in Africa in August 2009 when asking people to sign “Ed’s Pledge” (Note 4) with his “the world can’t afford to wait. The problem is urgent .. ”. Of course, after the COP15 extravaganza turned into a fiasco climate change was relegated from this exalted position and Number10.gov.uk The Official Site of the Prime Minister’s Office considers that “The greatest challenge Mr Brown faced in office was the worldwide financial crisis and the subsequent recession”.

Ed Miliband is sticking doggedly with his propaganda. In his effort to win leadership of the Labour Party he persisted with “climate change is the greatest challenge to our way of life” (Note 6) then in his presentation to the Labour Party Conference last month Note 7) he said “taking the difficult steps to protect our planet for future generations is the greatest challenge our generation faces”. What he is too dumb to accept is that it is the UN’s propaganda train that is heading for catastrophe, not global climates.

As for Frannie Armstrong and her Spanner Films, I’m afraid that they are heading for catastrophe too.

NB: I have removed http:’’www. from Notes 2, 3, 4, 5 & 7 and http:// from the rest
1) see sppiblog.org/news/the-environmental-activist-mind-set-the-age-of-utter-stupidity
2) see clickgreen.org.uk/big-interview/interview/12892-ed-milibands-ralph-miliband-lecture-he-politics-of-climate-change’.html
3) see independent.co.uk/environment/climate-change/climate-change-the-worlds-greatest-challenge-says-brown-1834252.html
4) see youtube.com/watch?v=bMMZheVpTgw&feature=related & youtube.com/watch?v=wR3gjETeLiE&NR=1
5) see number10.gov.uk/history-and-tour/prime-ministers-in-history/gordon-brown
6) see edmiliband.org/learnmore/we-need-to-change-to-win-eds-fabian-essay/ /
7) see guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/sep/28/ed-miliband-labour-conference-speech

Best regards, Pete Ridley
October 03, 2010
Votes: +0

Russell C said:

I refer to the awful 1010global video at the end of my 10/4/10 American Thinker article, "The Curious History of 'Global Climate Disruption' " http://www.americanthinker.com...lobal.html

In a way, Science Czar John Holdren's efforts over a decade ago are in a straight line to that 'detonate non-AGW believers' video - the basic idea being "don't defend the science, just make sure nobody trusts skeptics by ANY means possible."
October 04, 2010
Votes: +0

Write comment